No. 319 NAI DFA Paris Embassy 18/5
DUBLIN, 13 September 19431
French Minister here has for some time been corresponding with French Committee in North Africa.2 We gather Vichy authorities have been aware of this but have taken no action. French Minister is now issuing statement here stating he is accepting instructions from French Committee: statement consists simply of that and does not repudiate or refer to Vichy in any way. We feel by far the best solution is to maintain position which has existed for last few months. We are naturally anxious, whilst maintaining attitude proper to a neutral country, to avoid being put in the position of having to side with one set of Frenchmen against another. Moreover if Vichy dismisses Laforcade they will find it difficult if not impossible to replace him owing to Allied control of communications. That would mean that French Committee would have representative here even though he would have no official status and Vichy would have none. Our view is therefore that in their own interest Vichy should take no action against Laforcade merely because of present statement which is not expressly aimed against them; urge this view on Foreign Office and telegraph attitude.
The Royal Irish Academy's Documents on Irish Foreign Policy series has published an eBook of confidential correspondence on the 1921 Anglo-Irish Treaty negotiations.
The international network of Editors of Diplomatic Documents was founded in 1988. Delegations from different parts of the world met for the first time in London in 1989.
Read more ....