No. 286 NAI DFA Secretary's Files P113
Washington DC, 4 February 1947
My wife1 met Mrs. Jackson, wife of Associate Justice Robert H. Jackson (whom she has known for a long time) at a tea-party last week. Mrs. Jackson said that her husband, she feared, would never be the same after the Nuremburg Trials. He had felt very badly about sending men to the gallows. She added that there seemed to be a lot of discussion about the ethics of Trials, and Una said nothing. After a long pause, Mrs. Jackson asked point blank what Una's opinion was and she replied: 'I had better not tell you. If I did, I am afraid I would hurt you very much', which, of course, was saying a mouthful.
A couple of weeks ago, Judge James T. McGranery, Philadelphia, formerly Assistant US Attorney General, speaking in a room full of people, of whom I was one, said something which suggested that the opinion of the Attorney General's office was that Jackson's attitude was based on 'bad law'.
One of those present said that what the proceedings meant was that you had better be damned sure you win your next war, because if you don't, you'll be hanged as a War Criminal.
The Royal Irish Academy's Documents on Irish Foreign Policy series has published an eBook of confidential correspondence on the 1921 Anglo-Irish Treaty negotiations.
The international network of Editors of Diplomatic Documents was founded in 1988. Delegations from different parts of the world met for the first time in London in 1989.
Read more ....