No. 173 NAI DT S8837
Letter from Diarmuid O'Hegarty to William T. Cosgrave (Dublin), with handwritten reply by Cosgrave
Dublin, 19 January 1929
President,1
Sometime ago Mr. Henry J. Moloney, K.C., in the course of a casual conversation mentioned the question of Land Commission Annuities and suggested that in view of the considerable relief which farmers in Northern Ireland were receiving under the de-rating proposals a case might be made for some concession from the British Government in the matter of Land Commission Annuities in Saorstát Éireann. I think this suggestion must have originally emanated from Devlin2 but I am not quite sure. The main basis of the argument was that the special financial treatment of Northern Ireland both in regard to de-rating and to the remission of the annual contribution to the British Exchequer was rendering the possibility of a united Ireland more remote. I said to him that so far as I could see the proposal was not a sound one - that we had elected to become a self-governing dominion and that we could not have our cake and eat it. I must say that I did not pay very much attention to the proposal and I was surprised to receive from him a few days ago a letter and memorandum, copies of which I enclose,3 in which he goes into the proposal in detail. I have merely acknowledged the letter.
Apart from any other consideration it appears on first sight that the proposal for a five years Moratorium, even if it were accepted by the British Government, has two very grave objections. The first is that the interest for that five years would have to be borrowed and added to capital with the result that either the period of repayment would have to be extended or the annuity increased. The more important objection is however that the difficulty of inducing a person to recommence paying his debts after five years back-sliding seems to me to be almost insurmountable and I fear that the net result would be that the last condition would be worse than the first. If we had a five year moratorium all annuities would become uncollectable during that period.4
The letter, of course, calls for a reply and I am asking Mr. Roddy5 and Mr. Hogan,6 who are specially interested in the matter, to consider what answer should be given.7 Meanwhile the documents are circulated for general information in as much as they show a line of reasoning which may be put forward by a certain group in the country.
[signed] Diarmuid Ó hÉigeartaigh
[Handwritten note by William T. Cosgrave]
A My impression is that the last sentence of this paragraph is really what is intended.
The proposal is a badly devised political stunt. Assistance in any shape to agriculture can not be defended on a sectional basis. There are
| Wyndham purchasers | |
| Birrell purchasers | |
| Land Act 23 purchasers | |
| Fee Farm grant occupiers |
There are various classes in each of the four sections. In my neighbourhood, there are three persons who might be regarded - although one of them is a Dairyman, as farmers. There are in addition four other occupiers of purchased lands under the various Acts Wyndham and Birrell. To give these four a moratorium would be a joke, but they are all with one exception signatories to a petition for relief from 2nd moiety of rates. It looks as if in future any person in difficulty can be helped and at once by others regardless of all commercial and credit regulations binding on most other if not all peoples.
Purchase Volumes Online
ebooks
The Royal Irish Academy's Documents on Irish Foreign Policy series has published an eBook of confidential correspondence on the 1921 Anglo-Irish Treaty negotiations.
International Counterparts
The international network of Editors of Diplomatic Documents was founded in 1988. Delegations from different parts of the world met for the first time in London in 1989.
Read more ....